My area of focus for technology innovations over the next 20-25 years would be a "zero-waste nuclear reator." Typically, there is no arguement that nuclear power is a clean alternative way to produce electricity. However, the most pressing issue with using nuclear power is what to do with the waste. Today, the highly radioactive waste is stored in barrels which are encased in concrete, buried in salt caves, or even sunk to the bottom of the ocean.
Before the use of nuclear power can reach the levels of service required to support the planet, the issue of the waste must be dealt with. If we can process the fuel in such a way that at the end, there is no radioactive waste to dispose of, nuclear power could begin to approach mainstream usage.
In future blogs, I will explore this topic in more depth.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
Very timely prediction. I can see some technological, financial, political, social, cultural, ethical and legal issues that may affect it. *grins*
As you design your 2-3 models and consider risk as well as the aforementioned issues, will there be any benefits outside the energy and (hopefully) lack of waste?
You might wish to show an image that relfects the waste problem that your prediction addresses - in addition to the energy demands that are met by it. You can refer to an image from another cite and note the citation for it.
John,
Good topic for a prediction!
I was just chatting with a friend about nuclear powere plants and he commented that the materials necessary, are just as finite as crude oil, so it isn't a permanent solution. While still a finite resource, your idea would extend the lifespan of the source materials. I found a neat table on the sustainability of various nuclear sources and oil at http://www.ieer.org/ensec/no-1/comffnp.html
Steve
Excellent addition, Steve and thanks, John!
Post a Comment